The researcher used the scale by mccroskey and mccain 1974 to develop. Familiarity and interpersonal attraction 5 broad model of the familiarityattraction link, one that encompasses diverse operationalizations of familiarity and attraction and that can foster a new generation of research. F or at least the past two decades, theorists and researchers in interpersonal communication have centered much of their attention on interpersonal attraction. Taken from the 1974 survey constructed by mccroskey and mccain, this survey was designed in three parts. The results show that percent of attitude similarity influences interpersonal attraction and that selfesteem is related to attachment style. The interpersonal attraction scale consisted of 15 items measuring personal desirability. Two reasons for affiliation social comparison social exchange the theory that the theory that proposes that we evaluate our thoughts and actions by comparing them with those of others. Interpersonal attraction psychological effects of the internet. Participants that received dissimilar surveys reported to be less attracted to the. Attitude similarity and interpersonal attraction byrnes interpersonal attraction research and theory has a potential explanation for this dilemma byrne, 1961. Pdf a growing body of research explores that relationships are the significant part.
Researchers of attraction typically measure only the strength of attraction toward another person. Interpersonal attraction an overview sciencedirect topics. Interpersonal attraction scale the interpersonal attraction. A study of human factors in housing zajoncs 1968 attitudinal effects of mere exposure jpsp mirror exposure we like our reflection view better than the. In search of a theoretical rosetta stone research on interpersonal attraction has a checkered history. S in this study three properties of interpersonal attrac tion were measured using single scales. Factor analysis indicated three dimensions of the interpersonal attraction construct which were labeled task,social, and physical. Pdf interpersonal attraction and relationships researchgate. Interpersonal attraction is traditionally defined in social psychology as a positive attitude or evaluation regarding a particular person, including the three components conventionally ascribed to attitudes. The measurement of interpersonal attraction james c.
A sevenitem questionnaire we designed to measure communication. Document resume interpersonal attraction toward a black. A study of human factors in housing zajoncs 1968 attitudinal effects of mere exposure jpsp mirror exposure we like our reflection view better than the view that others see of us. Their alpha reliability estimates have ranged from the upper. Interpersonal attraction refers to the desire to be around and form a friendship or romantic relationship with another. Factor analysis indicated three dimensions of the interpersonal attraction construct which were labeled task social and. The single measure of attraction used most frequently and about which the most extensive empirical data are available is the interpersonal judgment scale 19. A growing body of research explores that relationships are the significant part of our lives.
International journal of innovation, management and. Please indicate your perceptions of the attractiveness of david letterman. Walter, aronsen, abrams, and rottman conducted an extensive field experiment to test the hypothesis that ones romantic aspirations are influenced by aspirations in other areas. There is not a single, unified theory of interpersonal attraction. Interpersonal attraction is the attraction between people which leads to a platonic or romantic relationships. These attitudes are sometimes measured by noting where an individual places an x on a scale in response to the question, how much do you like this person. However, this finding occurred only on the liking item of the interpersonal judgment scale ijs.
Interpersonal attraction, motivation in education, instructors qualities. Factor analysis indicated three dimensions of the interpersonal attraction construct which were labeled. These hypotheses were supported in experiment 1, which used male subjects. Defining familiarity and attraction before introducing this model, we first define our two central constructs. This instrument is a sixitem likerttype rating scale on which subjects evaluate target persons on sevenpoint dimensions of intelligence, knowledge of. Not only has interpersonal attraction been found to be. S in this study three properties of interpersonal attraction were measured using single scales. He proposed a method of attitudescale construction, wherein a number of finely honed attitude statements were presented, from 1 20, expressing a wide range of possible attitudes toward a person or object. The study of interpersonal attraction is a major area of.
Dec 09, 2011 in the initial attraction of two people, what matters first. Seven measures of interpersonal attraction general liking, perceived value similarity, perceived behavior similarity, eye contact, posture, head distance, and foot distancewere obtained from the interaction. According to these five factors, we like those who live or. Factor analysis indicated three dimensions of the interpersonal attraction construct which. This instrument is a sixitem likerttype rating scale on which subjects evaluate target persons on. Please indicate the degree to which each statement applies to you by marking whether you. Interpersonal communication inventory scoring key and norms lnstructiqns. This study also considers multiple organizational outcomes at. Matthew montoya brief description the twodimensional model of attraction tdma considers the attraction process from initial exposure to subjective experience to enacted behavior. In contrast, domainspecific evolutionary perspectives emphasize that people possess specific needs that were linked to reproductive success in humans ancestral past, and these. Pdf interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal. Eric ed071140 the measurement of interpersonal attraction. Interpersonal attraction can be defined as a motivational state in which an indi vidual is predisposed to think, feel, and usually behave in a positive manner toward another person berscheid 1985. Chinenye rita ifepe interpersonal attraction scale introduction three dimesions previous research interpersonal attraction scale methodmeasurement procedures ten likert items were generated for each of the three presumed dimensions of interpersonal attraction.
It is a scale in which a subject rates another person on factors such as intelligence, knowledge of current events, morality, adjustment, likability, and desirability as a work partner. Factor analysis indicated three dimensions of the interpersonal attraction construct which were labeled task social and physical. This construct of facetoface communication is presented as a form of internal and external factors. Not only has interpersonal attraction been found to be a facilitator of interpersonal. Interpersonal communication skills inventory purpose this interpersonal communication skills inventory is designed to provide individuals with some insights into their communication strengths and potential areas for development. Why is it that we choose friends with aggressive tendencies or in other words do we sometimes find them to be attractive despite being aggressive. Interpersonal attraction doesnt only describe the attraction that happens between different sexes but it also explores the reasons that make certain people become friends. Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships margaret s. Interpersonal attraction can be influenced by many factors. Interpersonal attraction interpersonal attraction is the attraction between people which leads to a platonic or romantic relationships.
Pdf role of attitude similarity and proximity in interpersonal. When participants were presented strangers with similar attitudes, participants would report higher attraction. Change in physical attraction in early romantic relationships. The study reports a factor analytic investigation of the interpersonal attraction construct. The study examines important factors of attitude similarity and proximity working behind interpersonal attraction among. As with interpersonal attraction, researchers typically measure physical attraction by using a singleitem rating of a. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. The interpersonal attraction principle is especially interesting in todays society of matches made online. The goal of our research was to study the changes in physical attraction during the early stages of romantic relationships. When a target photo was presented, both women and men rated more physically attractive photos higher on a scale. Based on this distinction, it was hypothesized that the receipt of a benefit after the person has been benefited leads to greater attraction when an exchange relationship is preferred and decreases attraction when a communal relationship is desired. Almost all experimenters who are interested in interpersonal attraction investigate variables which may affect an individuals positive or negative attitude toward another person. Research on heterosexual romantic attraction shows that people talk more to, are friendlier toward, request more dates from and prefer those who are physically. Propinquity people you see and interact with the most often are most likely to become your friends and perhaps more mere exposure effect.
Familiarity and interpersonal attraction 1 running head. The attraction patterns which developed within the group were found to be positively related to preacquaintance similarity across a variety of attitudinal issues and, more strongly, to agreement in assessing other house members. Standardization and validation of hindi version of kansas marital satisfaction scale. This should both insure that the attraction results are distinct from motivation and ability factors and allow a comparison of the relative strengths of attraction variables and more conventional predictors of performance and salary. Clark carnegiemellon university judson mills university of maryland communal relationships, in which the giving of a benefit in response to a need for the benefit is appropriate, are distinguished from exchange relationships, in. According to a study released by in april 2010, one in five couples met online. Th ere is not a single, unifi ed theory of interpersonal attraction. These results were interpreted in terms of selfpresentation and may indicate a limitation of the ijs as a method of measuring attraction. This paper reports a factor analytic investigation of the interpersonal attraction construct. There was no effect of academic major on the workingwith item or the traditional composite measure. The interpersonal communication inventory, a selfreport instrument for assessing social skills, was given to undergraduate college students to determine its reliability. Twice as many couples met through online dating sites than at social events, bars, and clubs combined gleason, 2010. Interpersonal attraction as a process is distinct from perceptions of physical attractiveness, which involves views of what is and is not considered beautiful or attractive. By answering each question candidly, an individual will receive a profile that displays their level of.
Interpersonal attraction scale by chinenye ifepe on prezi. Thurstone 1928 was one of the first to investigate interpersonal attraction in a quantifiable way. Foundations of interpersonal attraction 1st edition. You may wonder why, if there is no specifi c theory, we should cover attraction in a theory book. Pdf on feb 1, 1978, t l huston and others published interpersonal. Interpersonal attraction is the attraction that happens between people that leads to the formation of either friendship or romantic relationships. They have been widely used by researchers in communication and psychology. Not surprisingly, people like others who are goodlooking. It flourished in the 1960s and 1970s before being largely eclipsed by research on established romantic relationships in the 1980s. To some extent, these are captured in the stereotypical images of these groups. Seven measures of interpersonal attractiongeneral liking, perceived value similarity, perceived behavior similarity, eye contact, posture, head distance, and foot distancewere obtained from the interaction. Interpersonal attraction and organizational outcomes.
For example, if you answered uyes to item 1 you would find be0\\7 that you get three points. Two hundredfifteen subjects completed 30 likerttype, 7step scales concerning an acquaintance. Many factors leading to interpersonal attraction have been studied. In order to engage psychology students in learning statistics and research methods, a survey was constructed which addressed the topic of interpersonal attraction and relationship satisfaction. Survey and interpersonal attraction measurement scale. Interpersonal attraction 3 interpersonal attraction. But there are other ways of measuring attraction, too. The longitudinal study explored the personality characteristics of a partner and relationship events affecting physical attraction of early within the first year romantic relationships. Interpersonal attraction 5 spouses sexual overtures i. Affinityseeking instrument asi, which is comprised of two scales, has internal con sistenc, a stable factor structure, and concurrent. The twodimensional model of attraction tdma considers the attraction process from. There are all sorts of questionnaire scales, like the interpersonal attraction scale, which ask people to rate how much they like another person. Evolutionary psychology, which largely jettisoned the most central.
In front of the item write the appro priate weight from the table on this page. In social psychology, interpersonal attraction is mostfrequently measured using the interpersonal attraction judgment scale developed by donn byrne. The scales below are designed to indicate how attractive you find another person to be. Interpersonal attraction is most frequently measured using the interpersonal. Two factors of facetoface communication were investigated through the development.
229 8 438 1466 1013 613 1345 998 761 1265 1534 1057 1077 937 634 848 677 1218 1574 1286 556 999 1299 1197 1099 1083 1263 1266 1379 34 216 677 617 912 154 720 774 1076 386